Posted by Brian Klais
Google has made huge strides lately indexing and displaying iOS (and Android) app profile pages within the regular search results. But curious minds want to know: just how is Google’s algorithm treating iOS apps listed among the “most popular apps” within the App Store’s Lifestyle category page?
To long-time SEO practitioners like myself, this is an interesting puzzle. Because the App Store’s Lifestyle (and other prominent app category) page increasingly resembles a classic “hub” page, like the old Yahoo directory.
For brands with apps ranked highly on this page, this is a potentially important ranking opportunity. Why? Because the App Store links to each app profile page using the app name as the internal link anchor text (see screenshot below).
Since many brands do include their brand name in the name of the app itself, we wanted to see if there is evidence that Google rankings may be influenced by these popular app profile pages when searching for the brand.
We selected 36 of the most recognizable retail brands (listed below) with apps featured on the “popular apps” section of the App Store Lifestyle page.
We then Googled for the brand name (with personalization switched off) and noted where the brand’s App Store app profile page was ranked.
Below is the Google position we found each app profile page ranked when searching for the brand’s name (as of December 12, 2011), followed by a chart mapping the distribution of App Store Popularity to Google Ranking:
|The Home Depot||7|
|Toys R Us||12|
|Abercrombie & Fitch||14|
For examples, see screenshots for eBay and JC Penney iOS apps, below:
#1: Brands with apps in the top 50 most popular App Store listings generally have their apps ranked higher in Google (averaging position 7) for brand searches that match the app’s name/anchor text.
#2: The effect of this “trusted endorsement” lessens the lower the app is listed on the page. Brands listed in the next 100 most popular apps ranked slightly lower (averaging Page 3, position 28). Brands listed in the remaining 100 apps rank lower still in Google (averaging Page 4, position 33).
(However, it’s worth noting: we did not consider change dynamics of the “popular app” list. Apps only recently added to the list may yet see the benefits of their new link equity later. This is a possible explanation for the lower Google rankings of apps listed on the page.)
#3: Having an app profile page listed as a “popular app” on the Lifestyle page does indeed correspond with, and likely has a causal effect upon the app’s Google rankings for queries that match the app’s anchor text.
A convenient way of visualizing the general ranking correlation we found, organized by column on the Lifestyle page:
We think the data suggest a virtuous cycle between Google visibility and App Store popularity (as a “directory”).
Brands with iOS or Android apps should take advantage of this unique opportunity to optimize app pages to reach brand searchers, while at the same time using search visibility to jump-start the popularity of their apps for users.
We see this objective quickly becoming the scope of “App SEO” as a discipline going forward, and we believe brands should consider such “App SEO” a high-priority, alongside other Search and Mobile initiatives.
No doubt Google’s algorithm for ranking apps will change over time. So watch this space!